Bad original work is better than any synthetic talking points

I know I’m not a great writer. I am not trained to write, and I am as structured as a condemned building. What I have going for me is that I have original thoughts. I know someone who has somehow conned their way into a job where their bosses tell them what to write. This “writer” claims to have been published in all these different publications, but is it really being published when their organization bought space in a publication and this “writer” was chosen to copy and paste the organization’s hack talking points?

The “writer”’s work is really just shlock, hack, talking points. I found the “writer”’s work through a Google search and most of it was on a site that’s one of those wannabe “Patriot” research organizations, but we all know as much as every employee thinks they are some badass that wants to upend the system, they make sure their taxes are paid on the 15th like the good lapdogs they really are. I just read the waste of bandwidth on my screen and laughed. I respect the grift where all you have to do is hit copy and paste on what they are told to put your name on and you get paid. But then again, it’s not original or creative, plus you are the one who gets the bullets while potentially get found out as a fraud at any time by anyone who just has to half-ass an argument you aren’t prepared to debate